An Analysis of Samsung’s Diversification from Major Platform Dependencies


Strategic Autonomy in the Tech Ecosystem: An Analysis of Samsung’s Diversification from Major Platform Dependencies

1. Introduction

In the contemporary technology landscape, platform dependency poses both operational and strategic risks for global firms. Samsung Electronics, a leading conglomerate in consumer electronics, semiconductors, and software, exemplifies a diversified approach to mitigating such reliance. Despite being a major participant in ecosystems dominated by Google, Microsoft, Qualcomm, and others, Samsung has employed a calculated strategy of partial independence. This paper examines how Samsung balances cooperation and competition with major players, and analyses its broad diversification tactics across operating systems, chipsets, cloud, voice assistants, artificial intelligence (AI), app ecosystems, and content platforms.


2. Theoretical Framework: Platform Dependence and Strategic Hedging

Platform dependence occurs when a firm’s product or service is significantly shaped by another company’s technological infrastructure (Gawer & Cusumano, 2014). Excessive reliance can limit innovation, reduce bargaining power, and expose the firm to platform changes or antitrust actions. As a response, strategic hedging involves creating alternative solutions, developing in-house capabilities, or forming alliances to dilute single-vendor risks (Teece, 2018).

Samsung’s strategy reflects this approach: it integrates with global platforms while simultaneously building alternatives to ensure ecosystem flexibility and resilience.


3. Android and Google: Customisation without Subservience

Although Samsung’s smartphones run on Google’s Android OS, it avoids full integration with Google’s ecosystem through multiple tactics:

  • One UI, Samsung’s proprietary user interface, overlays Android with unique design and features, distinguishing the user experience (Kim, 2021).
  • Samsung promotes its own Galaxy Store, Samsung Internet Browser, Samsung Messages, and Samsung Keyboard as alternatives to Google Play, Chrome, and Gboard.
  • It developed Bixby, its own voice assistant, despite Google Assistant being bundled with Android devices.
  • Samsung also maintained Tizen OS for smartwatches and smart TVs to reduce dependency on Android and Google TV (Roh et al., 2020).

Moreover, Samsung increasingly supports on-device AI through its proprietary Samsung Gauss model, bypassing Google’s cloud-based Gemini model for many tasks.


4. Semiconductor Strategy: Independence from Qualcomm, ARM, and TSMC

Samsung’s semiconductor strategy reveals a drive for vertical integration and architectural freedom:

  • While Qualcomm’s Snapdragon chips power many Galaxy devices, Samsung uses its in-house Exynos chips in select markets. This dual-sourcing approach ensures price leverage and supply resilience (Lee & Cho, 2019).
  • Samsung collaborates with AMD for GPU integration into Exynos, reducing dependence on ARM’s GPU IP.
  • In addition, Samsung invests in RISC-V, an open-source instruction set architecture, as a long-term hedge against ARM’s proprietary model (Chen, 2022).
  • To avoid sole reliance on TSMC, the world’s leading semiconductor foundry, Samsung operates its own Samsung Foundry, competing directly in advanced nodes such as 3nm Gate-All-Around (GAA) transistors (IC Insights, 2023).

5. Cloud, AI, and Software: Strategic Collaborations with Microsoft and Beyond

Samsung leverages Microsoft’s cloud and productivity tools while keeping autonomy:

  • OneDrive and Outlook are bundled with Samsung devices, yet Samsung operates its own services like Samsung Notes, Samsung Cloud (partially phased out), and Samsung Knox for security.
  • Through DeX, Samsung offers a desktop interface powered by its smartphones—similar in vision to Microsoft Continuum, but developed independently.
  • Samsung’s AI efforts are now spearheaded by Samsung Research, which developed the Gauss LLM to support on-device summarisation, translation, and image editing (Samsung Newsroom, 2023).

This dual approach gives Samsung flexibility to serve enterprise customers without being tied to Microsoft’s Azure ecosystem.


6. Consumer Ecosystem: Competing with Apple and Amazon

Samsung builds its own product ecosystem resembling Apple’s, but with more cross-platform openness:

  • Galaxy Buds, Galaxy Watch, Galaxy Tab, and Samsung Smart TVs are integrated via SmartThings, offering seamless connectivity and continuity (Chung, 2021).
  • Unlike Apple’s closed model, Samsung supports both Google Assistant and Amazon Alexa alongside Bixby, and embraces multi-protocol support in SmartThings (e.g. Matter, Zigbee).
  • Samsung’s TV Plus, a free ad-supported streaming service, competes with YouTube and Amazon Prime by offering exclusive content on Samsung TVs.

Meanwhile, Samsung maintains direct-to-consumer sales channels (Samsung.com, Samsung Shop App) to reduce dependence on Amazon e-commerce infrastructure.


7. Automotive and XR Innovation: Harman, Android Auto, and Meta Independence

In automotive and extended reality (XR) domains, Samsung has opted for independent strategies:

  • Acquiring Harman International (2017) gave Samsung in-house capabilities in connected car infotainment systems, reducing dependency on Android Auto or Apple CarPlay.
  • Samsung’s earlier MirrorLink initiative aimed to bypass Android Auto entirely.
  • In XR, Samsung terminated its Gear VR partnership with Meta’s Oculus, shifting towards joint XR development with Google and Qualcomm, announced in 2023.

These moves suggest Samsung aims to shape rather than follow next-generation computing platforms.


8. Regional Diversification and Regulatory Flexibility

Samsung adapts services regionally to avoid platform lock-in:

  • In China, where Google is banned, Samsung devices rely on local apps like Baidu and WeChat.
  • In India, Samsung Wallet supports UPI payments, displacing Google Pay’s position.
  • Samsung complies with anti-Google regulatory rulings in the EU and South Korea by offering browser and app choice screens.

This geopolitical agility ensures Samsung’s devices remain competitive and compliant across regulatory environments.


9. Summary: Samsung’s Multi-Axis Independence Strategy

Samsung’s independence strategy is multi-dimensional:

Dependency AreaMain PlatformSamsung’s Diversification Tactic
Mobile OS & AppsGoogleOne UI, Galaxy Store, Bixby
ChipsetsQualcomm/ARMExynos, AMD, RISC-V
Cloud & SoftwareMicrosoftKnox, Samsung Cloud, DeX
AI ModelsGoogle GeminiSamsung Gauss (on-device AI)
FoundryTSMCSamsung Foundry (GAA tech)
ContentYouTube/NetflixTV Plus, Smart Hub
RetailAmazonSamsung Shop + Direct Sales
XRMeta (Oculus)Independent XR with Google/Qualcomm
NavigationGoogle MapsHERE Maps, localisation
In-Car TechAndroid AutoHarman Automotive, SmartThings Auto

10. Conclusion

Samsung’s global success is not only due to its product excellence but also its sophisticated navigation of platform dependencies. By maintaining partnerships with dominant players like Google and Microsoft, while concurrently developing in-house capabilities and supporting open standards, Samsung achieves a balance of ecosystem participation and platform sovereignty. This approach not only enhances user experience and product differentiation but also protects against regulatory shifts and technological monopolies—making Samsung a paradigmatic example of strategic autonomy in the digital age.


References

  • Chen, T. (2022). RISC-V: The Open-Source Chip Architecture Gaining Momentum. IEEE Spectrum.
  • Chung, S. (2021). The Role of SmartThings in Samsung’s Connected Strategy. Samsung Developer Conference.
  • Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2014). Industry Platforms and Ecosystem Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), 417–433.
  • IC Insights. (2023). Foundry Market Share and Node Roadmap Analysis. Retrieved from www.icinsights.com
  • Kim, Y. (2021). User Experience Differentiation in One UI Compared to Stock Android. Journal of Mobile UX, 6(1), 55–72.
  • Lee, H., & Cho, M. (2019). Dual Sourcing in Mobile Chipsets: The Samsung Case. Seoul Tech Review, 11(2), 89–104.
  • Roh, T. et al. (2020). Why Samsung Keeps Tizen Alive. Samsung Newsroom.
  • Samsung Newsroom. (2023). Introducing Samsung Gauss: Our Foundation AI Model. Retrieved from news.samsung.com