Chapter 5 – The Gap Theory (Disputed Stage)


Possible Ruined Creation or Pre-Adamic Earth

Biblical Basis: A Chaotic Earth and Echoes of Judgement

Genesis 1:2 states, “Now the earth was formless and void” (Hebrew: tohu wa-bohu, תֹהוּ וָבֹהוּ), with darkness covering the surface of the deep and the Spirit of God hovering over the waters. This evocative phrase also appears in Jeremiah 4:23, where it describes a scene of devastation and divine judgement. The parallel usage suggests that tohu wa-bohu may indicate not merely an initial undeveloped state, but a condition of desolation resulting from prior catastrophe.

Further support is drawn from 2 Peter 3:5–6, which refers to a former world that “perished, being overflowed with water.” While often associated with the Noahic Flood, some interpreters view this as an allusion to a pre-Adamic judgement, distinct in time and character from the Genesis 6–9 narrative.

These biblical echoes open the door to the Gap Theory, which posits a temporal interval between Genesis 1:1 and 1:2—a time during which an original creation may have existed and subsequently fallen into ruin.


Theological Implication: Ruin, Rebellion, and Restoration

The Gap Theory (or Ruin-Restoration Theory) proposes that Genesis 1:1 describes the original creation, brought into existence by God in perfection, while Genesis 1:2 depicts its fallen state, possibly as a result of Satanic rebellion and divine judgement. Between these two verses lies an undefined span of time, during which catastrophic spiritual events may have transpired.

According to this model:

  • Satan and his angels rebelled (cf. Isaiah 14:12–15; Ezekiel 28:12–17).
  • A pre-Adamic world was judged and rendered desolate.
  • The six days of Genesis 1:3–31 represent not initial creation, but a re-ordering or restoration of a previously judged Earth.

This interpretation allows for continuity with geological findings and offers a theological explanation for spiritual conflict predating humanity. It also upholds the sovereignty and holiness of God, who responds decisively to rebellion while preparing the world anew for human stewardship.

Though not without controversy, the Gap Theory provides a possible harmonisation between Scripture and deep-time geological evidence, without requiring a symbolic reading of the creation days.


Scientific Consideration: Geological and Palaeontological Correlations

From a scientific perspective, the Earth presents evidence of deep antiquity. Radiometric dating of rocks, the fossil record, and observable geological layers suggest a planet that is billions of years old, shaped by multiple cycles of catastrophe and renewal.

Among these features:

  • Mass extinction events (e.g., the Permian–Triassic and Cretaceous–Paleogene extinctions).
  • Extensive fossilised life forms predating humanity.
  • Clear stratification of Earth’s crust, suggesting long periods of development.

Proponents of the Gap Theory argue that such evidence may reflect a pre-Adamic creation, destroyed prior to the six-day reconstitution of the world. This model permits the existence of ancient ecosystems and civilisations, while maintaining a literal interpretation of the Genesis re-creation narrative.

Although speculative, this view allows for scientific engagement without compromising theological orthodoxy, and it retains the biblical emphasis on divine order, judgement, and restoration.


Summary: Ruined Creation and Restored Purpose

The Gap Theory remains a debated but enduring interpretive model within Christian theology. It offers a compelling attempt to integrate biblical narrative, geological evidence, and the theological realities of cosmic rebellion.

By proposing a ruined pre-Adamic world followed by a six-day restoration, the theory affirms both the seriousness of spiritual rebellion and the redemptive character of God’s creative work. It suggests that Genesis 1:3 does not begin the act of creation ex nihilo, but marks a divine reordering of chaos into cosmos, restoring the Earth as a stage for the unfolding drama of redemption.

In this reading, the Genesis narrative proclaims not only origin, but also recovery—setting the tone for the broader biblical theme of creation, fall, judgement, and renewal.