How can Rhema teaching be misused to justify subjective impressions over biblical truth, and what safeguards should believers and churches implement to prevent such misuse?


1. Introduction

The concept of Rhema as a specific, personal word from God is widely taught in Charismatic and Pentecostal circles. While it encourages dynamic, Spirit-led Christian living, its misuse can lead to:

  • Doctrinal error.
  • Manipulation by leaders.
  • Confusion and spiritual harm among believers.

Understanding the potential dangers and biblical safeguards is vital for sound doctrine and healthy spiritual practice.


2. Nature of Rhema Teaching

2.1 Definition

Rhema (ῥῆμα)Explanation
Greek meaningA spoken word, utterance, or saying. Biblically used for speech, Scripture quotations, or gospel proclamation.
Charismatic understandingA Spirit-given, specific word for guidance, prophecy, or encouragement in a particular situation.

3. Potential Misuses of Rhema Teaching

3.1 Elevating Rhema Above Scripture

MisuseExplanation
Authoritative claimTreating Rhema words as equal to or above Scripture, giving personal impressions binding authority without biblical testing.
Doctrinal additionUsing Rhema to introduce new teachings not grounded in the Bible, undermining the sufficiency of Scripture (2 Timothy 3:16–17).

3.2 Justifying Personal Desires or Biases

MisuseExplanation
Self-serving interpretationsUsing “God told me…” to legitimise personal choices, desires, or biases without accountability.
Emotional projectionMistaking strong feelings or wishes for divine instruction (Jeremiah 23:25–32 warns of prophets speaking from their own hearts).

3.3 Manipulative Leadership Practices

MisuseExplanation
Controlling othersLeaders claiming exclusive Rhema words to demand obedience, money, or personal loyalty.
Spiritual intimidationThreatening spiritual harm or loss of blessing if Rhema instructions are questioned, suppressing critical discernment.

3.4 Doctrinal and Ethical Errors

MisuseExplanation
Contradicting ScriptureActing on Rhema words that conflict with biblical teaching on morality, doctrine, or church practice.
Cultic tendenciesGroups elevating leader’s Rhema revelations as ultimate truth, leading to heretical or abusive communities.

4. Biblical and Theological Analysis

4.1 Testing All Words

VersePrinciple
1 Thessalonians 5:19–21“Do not quench the Spirit. Do not despise prophecies, but test everything; hold fast what is good.”
1 John 4:1“Do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God.”
Isaiah 8:20“To the law and to the testimony! If they do not speak according to this word, they have no light of dawn.”

All Rhema words are subject to Scriptural testing and discernment, not accepted uncritically.


4.2 Scripture as Final Authority

4.2.1 Sola Scriptura Principle

DoctrineExplanation
Sufficiency of ScriptureThe Bible contains all that is necessary for faith and practice; no further normative revelation is needed (2 Timothy 3:16–17).

4.3 The Role of the Spirit

  • The Holy Spirit never contradicts Scripture (John 16:13; 2 Peter 1:20–21).
  • Rhema words are best understood as Spirit-applied insights or applications within the framework of God’s revealed Word.

5. Safeguards Against Misuse

5.1 Prioritise Scriptural Authority

  • Teach that Scripture is the final standard; Rhema words must align with it.

5.2 Cultivate Discernment and Testing

ApplicationPractice
Individual discernmentTest impressions for Scriptural consistency, godly fruit, and Christ-centredness.
Community evaluationProphetic Rhema words weighed by mature believers and church leadership (1 Corinthians 14:29).

5.3 Train Leaders in Humility and Accountability

  • Leaders should model humility, teachability, and submission to Scripture, never using Rhema claims for personal power or control.

5.4 Encourage Mature Spiritual Formation

AspectFocus
Bible literacyEquips believers to discern true from false teachings.
Spirit-led prayerSeeks God’s guidance while rooted in His Word.
Community safeguardsPromotes collective discernment, avoiding isolated subjectivism.

6. Summary Table

Potential MisuseSafeguard
Elevating Rhema over ScriptureUphold Scripture as final authority for all faith and practice.
Using Rhema to justify personal desiresTest all words against biblical teaching and wise counsel.
Manipulative Rhema claims by leadersEnsure accountability, communal discernment, and servant leadership.
Doctrinal errors or cultic tendenciesMaintain sound doctrine rooted in apostolic teaching (Acts 2:42).

7. Conclusion

Rhema teaching can be misused to justify subjective impressions over biblical truth if:

  • Scripture’s authority is undermined.
  • Leaders or individuals elevate personal impressions to untested divine commands.

Healthy practice requires:

  • Upholding Scripture as the ultimate authority.
  • Testing all Rhema words for biblical faithfulness, ethical integrity, and godly fruit.
  • Cultivating humble, Spirit-led discernment within the body of Christ to ensure spiritual growth, doctrinal soundness, and Christlike witness.

8. References

  • Grudem, W. (2000). The Gift of Prophecy in the New Testament and Today. Leicester: IVP.
  • Carson, D. A. (1996). Exegetical Fallacies (2nd ed.). Grand Rapids: Baker.
  • Fee, G. D. (1994). God’s Empowering Presence: The Holy Spirit in the Letters of Paul. Peabody: Hendrickson.
  • Packer, J. I. (1996). Concise Theology: A Guide to Historic Christian Beliefs. Wheaton: Tyndale.