Is Logos in Scripture equivalent to the entire written Bible, with Rhema being a part of it applied specifically, as often taught in Charismatic theology?


1. Introduction

In many Charismatic and Pentecostal teachings, it is commonly stated:

  • Logos = the entire written Word of God (the Bible).
  • Rhema = a specific spoken or applied word drawn from Logos for a particular situation.

The question is whether this distinction is biblically and linguistically accurate or a practical teaching tool without strict exegetical basis.


2. Biblical and Lexical Analysis

2.1 Logos (λόγος)

2.1.1 General Greek Meaning

  • Word, speech, message, discourse, reason, or account.

2.1.2 Biblical Usage

ContextMeaningExamples
Christ HimselfThe eternal divine Word.John 1:1 – “In the beginning was the Logos…”
Gospel proclamationThe preached message.Acts 10:44 – Peter preaching, Holy Spirit falls.
ScriptureGod’s written Word.Mark 7:13 – “You nullify the Word (Logos) of God by your tradition.”
General speechOrdinary usage.Acts 15:32 – Judas and Silas spoke much (Logos) to encourage.

2.2 Rhema (ῥῆμα)

2.2.1 General Greek Meaning

  • That which is spoken, utterance, saying.

2.2.2 Biblical Usage

ContextMeaningExamples
Spoken commands or promisesDirect word to an individual.Luke 1:38 – Mary: “Let it be to me according to your Rhema.”
Scripture quotationWritten Word cited.Luke 4:4 – “Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every Rhema of God.”
Preached gospel messageHearing leads to faith.Romans 10:17 – “Faith comes by hearing… the Rhema of Christ.”
General sayingOrdinary speech.Acts 5:20 – “Go… tell the people all the Rhema of this life.”

2.3 Overlapping and Interchangeability

Scholars agree:

  • Logos and Rhema often overlap in meaning. Context determines nuance.
  • Both can refer to Scripture, gospel proclamation, or spoken words, undermining rigid doctrinal separation.

Theological Dictionary of the New Testament (Kittel, 1964)

Logos and Rhema are largely interchangeable; Rhema emphasises the spoken aspect, but there is no ontological or systematic doctrinal distinction.


3. Charismatic Teaching: Logos as Bible; Rhema as Specific Application

3.1 Teaching Summary

TeachingExplanation
LogosThe whole written Word (Bible).
RhemaA verse or promise specifically quickened by the Spirit to a believer’s situation.

3.2 Linguistic Evaluation

  • Logos is used for Scripture in some texts (e.g. Mark 7:13), but also refers to Christ Himself, gospel preaching, and general speech.
  • Rhema also refers to Scripture quotations (Luke 4:4) and gospel preaching (Romans 10:17).

Thus, Scripture does not define Logos exclusively as the written Bible, nor Rhema as merely a part applied specifically. These distinctions are:

  • Practical teaching tools within Charismatic discipleship.
  • Not strict biblical categories demanded by Greek usage.

4. Theological Implications

4.1 Practical Value

  • The Logos–Rhema distinction encourages believers to seek Spirit-led application of Scripture, fostering relational engagement with God’s Word.

4.2 Risks of Rigid Doctrinal Separation

  • May oversimplify biblical vocabulary, leading to lexical fallacies (Carson, 1996).
  • Can suggest that Rhema words carry separate or higher authority, undermining the sufficiency of Scripture if not tested properly.

5. Biblical Integration: A Balanced View

5.1 Logos as God’s Communication

Logos broadly denotes God’s communication:

  • Eternal Word (Christ) – John 1:1.
  • Written Word (Scripture) – Mark 7:13.
  • Preached gospel – Acts 10:44.
  • Spoken teaching – Acts 15:32.

5.2 Rhema as God’s Spoken Word

Rhema denotes spoken words, commands, or quotations, often highlighting specific application or utterance, but:

  • It is not confined to “applied parts of Scripture”.
  • It is used for Scripture quotations themselves.

6. Summary Table

TermBiblical UsageCharismatic TeachingEvaluation
LogosChrist, Scripture, gospel, general speech.Entire written Bible.Partially accurate; broader biblical usage.
RhemaSpoken words, commands, Scripture quotes, gospel proclamation.Part of Scripture applied specifically to life.Practical but linguistically not exclusive.

7. Conclusion

Logos is not exclusively equivalent to the entire Bible, nor is Rhema strictly a part of Logos applied specifically. Biblically:

  • Both refer to God’s Word in various forms, with overlapping usage.
  • The Charismatic distinction is useful devotionally, encouraging believers to seek Spirit-illuminated application of Scripture.

However, it is essential to:

  • Avoid lexical absolutism unsupported by Scripture.
  • Uphold Scripture (Logos) as the final authority, with all Rhema words tested against it for sound doctrine and spiritual growth.

8. References

  • Carson, D. A. (1996). Exegetical Fallacies (2nd ed.). Grand Rapids: Baker.
  • Grudem, W. (2000). The Gift of Prophecy in the New Testament and Today. Leicester: IVP.
  • Fee, G. D. (1994). God’s Empowering Presence: The Holy Spirit in the Letters of Paul. Peabody: Hendrickson.
  • Kittel, G., & Friedrich, G. (Eds.). (1964). Theological Dictionary of the New Testament (Vol. 4). Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.