2. Early Interactions: Cooperation and Differences Between Paul and Peter


1. Introduction

The ministries of Paul and Peter intersected during the formative years of the early church, reflecting both cooperation in the spread of the gospel and emerging differences in approach and theological emphasis. This article examines their early interactions, highlighting how their distinct missions and audiences shaped the development of Christian identity.


2. Mutual Recognition and Cooperation

  • Paul and Peter recognised each other’s apostolic ministries. In Galatians 2:7-9, Paul recounts that James, Peter (Cephas), and John “gave the right hand of fellowship” to him and Barnabas, acknowledging their respective missions—Peter to the circumcised (Jewish Christians), Paul to the uncircumcised (Gentiles).
  • This mutual recognition signified a degree of cooperation and unity in the gospel’s advancement despite differing spheres of influence.

3. Differences in Ministry Focus and Method

  • Peter’s Ministry: Predominantly centred in Jerusalem, Peter’s mission was oriented towards Jewish believers, emphasising continuity with the Torah and the Jewish covenant heritage. Peter’s preaching at Pentecost (Acts 2) and subsequent ministry largely address Jewish audiences.
  • Paul’s Ministry: Paul’s apostolate targeted Gentile communities, often preaching in urban centres throughout the Roman Empire. His letters reveal a strong emphasis on liberation from the Law’s constraints and justification by faith, catering to a diverse, often Gentile audience.

4. Theological Tensions Emerge

  • The differing approaches led to theological and practical tensions, particularly concerning Gentile inclusion and observance of Jewish customs such as circumcision.
  • Peter’s initial hesitance to fully embrace Gentile believers without requiring adherence to the Law is depicted in Acts 10–11, where his vision and subsequent interaction with Cornelius mark a turning point.
  • However, even after this, tensions surfaced in church practice, foreshadowing the more explicit conflict between Paul and Peter at Antioch (Galatians 2:11-14).

5. Conclusion

While Paul and Peter initially exhibited cooperation and mutual recognition, their distinct missions to different peoples and theological emphases sowed seeds of tension. These early interactions set the stage for the later conflict at Antioch, reflecting broader challenges in the early church’s expansion and identity formation.


Would you like me to continue with Article 3, a detailed exegetical study of the Antioch incident as described in Galatians 2:11-21?