An Overview of Typical Obstacles and Their Impacts
Introduction
The doctoral journey is intellectually demanding and personally challenging. Awareness of common problems faced by PhD students is vital for timely identification and effective management. This article summarises typical issues encountered and their potential effects on academic progression and wellbeing.
8.1 Research-Related Challenges
Research Uncertainty and Scope Creep
- Difficulty in refining research questions and maintaining focus can lead to project delays and stress (Delamont, Atkinson & Parry, 2000).
- Overambitious or poorly defined scope risks overwhelming the candidate.
Literature Overload
- Managing vast and growing bodies of literature may cause confusion and indecision regarding relevant works (Booth, Sutton & Papaioannou, 2016).
Methodological Difficulties
- Challenges in mastering research methods and data analysis techniques can hinder progress (Creswell & Creswell, 2017).
- Ethics approval processes may also delay fieldwork or experiments.
8.2 Supervisory and Institutional Issues
Poor Supervisory Relationships
- Conflicts, lack of communication, or mismatched expectations between students and supervisors can lead to dissatisfaction and withdrawal (Lee, 2008).
Bureaucratic and Administrative Hurdles
- Navigating institutional policies, submission requirements, and progress monitoring can be complex and frustrating (Grant & Graham, 1999).
8.3 Personal and Psychological Challenges
Isolation and Loneliness
- The solitary nature of doctoral research can lead to feelings of social isolation (McAlpine & Amundsen, 2009).
Anxiety, Imposter Syndrome, and Stress
- High levels of performance pressure may induce anxiety and self-doubt, impacting motivation and mental health (Parkman, 2016).
Work-Life Balance
- Managing academic responsibilities alongside personal or professional commitments often results in fatigue and burnout (Evans et al., 2018).
8.4 Financial and Resource Constraints
- Insufficient funding or limited access to research resources can impede research activities and increase stress (HEFCE, 2015).
Conclusion
Recognising common challenges in PhD study allows candidates and institutions to implement supportive measures. Proactive strategies and access to resources are essential to mitigate adverse impacts and promote successful doctoral completion.
References
- Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
- Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
- Delamont, S., Atkinson, P., & Parry, O. (2000). The Doctoral Experience: Success and Failure in Graduate School. London: Falmer Press.
- Evans, T., Stevenson, K., & Tregidga, J. (2018). Flexible doctoral education: Fitting the PhD around life. Studies in Higher Education, 43(7), 1159–1172. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1223599
- Grant, B. M., & Graham, A. (1999). ‘Problematising ourselves’: postgraduate supervision as a discourse of power. Teaching in Higher Education, 4(1), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356251990040109
- HEFCE (Higher Education Funding Council for England). (2015). The PhD Degree: A Guide to Good Practice. Bristol: HEFCE.
- Lee, A. (2008). How Are Doctoral Students Supervised? Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802049202
- McAlpine, L., & Amundsen, C. (2009). Identity and agency in doctoral education. Studies in Higher Education, 34(6), 743–755. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802597111
- Parkman, A. (2016). The Imposter Phenomenon in Higher Education: Incidence and Impact. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 16(1), 51–60.