2.5 Comparison of Traditional PhD, PhD by Publication, and Postdoctoral Positions


An Academic Analysis


Introduction

Understanding the distinctions and complementarities between a traditional PhD, a PhD by Publication, and postdoctoral positions is essential for academic career planning. This article offers a detailed comparison across key dimensions, elucidating the nature, requirements, and purposes of each.


Definitional Overview

Degree/PositionDescription
Traditional PhDA research degree culminating in a comprehensive thesis demonstrating original scholarship.
PhD by PublicationA doctoral degree awarded on the basis of a portfolio of peer-reviewed published papers, supplemented by a linking thesis.
Postdoctoral PositionA temporary research role undertaken post-PhD to deepen expertise, build publication record, and gain independence.

Comparative Dimensions

4.1 Purpose and Outcome

  • Traditional PhD: Develop deep expertise, culminating in a thesis that presents original findings and theoretical contributions (Delamont et al., 2000).
  • PhD by Publication: Emphasises peer-reviewed research output as primary evidence of scholarly contribution (Higher Education Academy, 2014).
  • Postdoctoral Position: Focuses on further research training, publication, and establishing an independent research profile (Park, 2005).

4.2 Structure and Requirements

AspectTraditional PhDPhD by PublicationPostdoctoral Position
Main SubmissionSingle thesisMultiple published papers + linking thesisResearch outputs, reports, publications (no thesis)
Publication RequirementEncouraged, not mandatoryMandatoryEssential for career progression
DurationTypically 3–4 yearsSimilar duration1–3 years fixed-term contract
AssessmentThesis examination + vivaPortfolio + linking thesis + vivaPerformance appraisal, publication output
Independence LevelDeveloping research skillsDemonstrating scholarly independenceIncreasing autonomy and leadership

4.3 Career Implications

  • Traditional PhD: Provides comprehensive research training; foundational for academic and research careers (Murray, 2011).
  • PhD by Publication: May accelerate academic career by evidencing peer-reviewed outputs early (Griffith University, 2020).
  • Postdoc: Essential stepping stone in competitive research fields; improves employability and grant acquisition chances (Mason et al., 2013).

4.4 Disciplinary Suitability

  • Traditional PhD: Favoured in humanities, social sciences, and arts disciplines.
  • PhD by Publication: Common in sciences, medicine, engineering, and increasingly in social sciences.
  • Postdoc: Predominantly a feature of STEM disciplines but growing in others.

Conclusion

Each pathway serves distinct but overlapping purposes within academic careers. The traditional PhD emphasises sustained research and thesis development, the PhD by Publication foregrounds validated research outputs, and postdoctoral roles focus on advancing independence and expertise. Prospective candidates should consider their discipline, publication record, career goals, and institutional options when choosing their pathway.


References

  • Delamont, S., Atkinson, P., & Parry, O. (2000). The Doctoral Experience: Success and Failure in Graduate School. London: Falmer Press.
  • Griffith University. (2020). PhD by Publication Guidelines. Retrieved from https://www.griffith.edu.au/research/doctorates/phd-by-publication
  • Higher Education Academy (HEA). (2014). Principles for Doctoral Examination. York: HEA.
  • Mason, M. A., Goulden, M., & Frasch, K. (2013). Why Graduate Students Reject the Academic Career. University of California Press.
  • Murray, R. (2011). How to Write a Thesis (3rd ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  • Park, S. (2005). The Postdoctoral Experience: A Literature Review. Research Policy, 34(2), 279–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.12.004