7.6 Full-Time vs Part-Time PhD Study


A Comparative Analysis


Introduction

Choosing between full-time and part-time doctoral study is a significant decision that impacts the duration, intensity, and experience of the PhD journey. This article compares these two modes of study, highlighting their respective advantages, challenges, and suitability for different candidates.


Duration and Intensity

  • Full-Time Study:
    Typically completed within three to four years in the UK and similar academic systems (HEFCE, 2015). Full-time candidates generally dedicate 35–40 hours per week to research activities (Mowbray & Halse, 2010).
  • Part-Time Study:
    Generally spans six to eight years or longer, with candidates allocating 15–20 hours per week. This mode accommodates concurrent professional or personal responsibilities (Evans et al., 2018).

Advantages and Challenges

AspectFull-Time PhDPart-Time PhD
AdvantagesImmersive research experience; faster completion; greater access to university resources and networks.Flexibility to balance work/family; opportunity to apply research directly in professional contexts; financial sustainability.
ChallengesHigh intensity and potential for burnout; less income if not funded.Longer duration; potential isolation; risk of slower progress due to competing demands.
SupervisionFrequent and regular supervision meetings.Potentially fewer meetings; requires proactive communication.
Funding OpportunitiesMore scholarships and stipends available.Limited funding options; often self-funded or employer-supported.
Career ImpactFaster entry to postdoctoral or academic roles.Enables simultaneous career development outside academia.

Suitability Considerations

  • Full-Time: Recommended for candidates able to commit exclusively to research, often funded by scholarships or grants. Suitable for early-career researchers without significant external obligations.
  • Part-Time: Ideal for professionals, caregivers, or those with financial constraints seeking to integrate doctoral study with other commitments.

Recommendations

  • Candidates should evaluate personal circumstances, career objectives, financial situation, and institutional support before choosing study mode.
  • Clear communication with supervisors and institutions about expectations and support needs is essential.

Conclusion

Both full-time and part-time doctoral study have distinct merits and challenges. Understanding these differences aids prospective candidates in selecting the mode that best aligns with their academic ambitions and life circumstances.


References

  • Evans, T., Stevenson, K., & Tregidga, J. (2018). Flexible doctoral education: Fitting the PhD around life. Studies in Higher Education, 43(7), 1159–1172. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1223599
  • HEFCE (Higher Education Funding Council for England). (2015). The PhD Degree: A Guide to Good Practice. Bristol: HEFCE.
  • Mowbray, S., & Halse, C. (2010). The purpose of doctoral education. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(6), 653–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.487202